Your thinking stops disappearing. Your decisions start compounding.
The most valuable byproduct of the collaboration between a human and an AI is the thinking — and in ordinary practice, all of it evaporates. You can already make good decisions with your AI. Every session produces reasoning you will need again, and lose by default. This keeps the why, so it compounds.

Dump your thinking into a seed — messy is fine, dictation is fine; capture
first. Your AI chunks it into ADRs that keep what usually evaporates: your
actual words, the options considered, the reasoning, the open questions. Every
question is findable by one grep — ### QST: — or surfaced by the editor
extension, the MCP server, the phone in your pocket; and each arrives with the
AI’s options, its recommendation, its rationale, its stated confidence,
and what would prove it wrong — so answering streamlines to accept or
override: Cognitive load down, bandwidth freed for the deliberations that
matter. It’s where conversations become decisions that keep their reasons —
deliberative programming, in one habit.
You don’t need to be an experienced engineer to start. The method was built through daily practice by one human and a growing crew of AI collaborators, and its whole point is that the record does the remembering — as much for the veteran with too many projects, as for the beginner building their very first one.

The extension’s Open Questions view, on this project’s own record: A question, its options, an attributed recommendation — and the answer box. Question 16 of 75, that day.
Not transcript archival. Not vector-database “memory.” Not an orchestration platform. Not a claim that an AI possesses persistent identity — the record holds, minds change, and the work resumes either way.
The most valuable thing that happens between a human and an AI is not the code, the draft, or the answer. It’s the thinking — and in ordinary practice, all of it evaporates. […] It does not make an AI persistent, and it does not make anyone remember. It makes the work resumable — and the thinking compound.
— from What is ADRs4AI?, the founding essay. A stranger can read it cold; its authorship and review record are public, because that is the method.